Home |
Art |
Writing |
Travel |
ShopOut of Control #2
Compulsive Hoarding and Prodigious Amassments of Crap
Vast
putrescent mounds of disjected rubbish have always been among the
characteristic productions of the human species. Archeologists may be
excused their fixation on the carefully crafted spearheads of our
ancestors, to the exclusion of the massive heaps of bones, shells and
desiccated excrementa which pour forth from the caves, and accumulate
alongside the hovels, of prehistoric peoples. Yet the polished obsidian
arrowheads and exquisitely shaped spearpoints of such societies belie
the abominable and catastrophic activities of all human groups, which
are, a universal trend to the extermination or enslavement of all other
forms of life, and an insatiable lust to amass useless objects. Shell
middens, bone heaps and deep layered strata accumulated in caves all
represent early precursors to the grotesque and obscene mountains of
useless extruded plastic crap, inextinguishable burning hills of tires,
and vats of toxic, supercarcinogenic slurry that are the results of
contemporary civilization.
The excavation of
ancient cities in Anatolia and Mesopotamia involves digging down
through compressed and mounded layers of dirt and archeological
remains, referred to as Tells. These rise above the surrounding desert
as clear evidence of the human tendency to collect and amass objects.
Who was it that defined man as an animal with pockets? The results of
Homer’s immortal conflict are compressed into Troy VIIa, merely one of
many successive cities layered into a single massive mound. Ancient
cities rest far below their modern descendants, standing atop deep
strata of moulde, the decayed and compacted remains of all previous
human activity on that spot. The rodential, insectoidal human
tendencies to amass and hoard could not be more plainly demonstrated
than by these piles of amassed remains, rising above the plains of the
Fertile Crescent, birthplace of our civilization. The heaps of ostraca,
the potshards of the Athenians, which served them as a sort of scratch
paper, were merely the paltry precursors of the mountainous
accumulations of smashed amphorae that built up near the seaports of
Rome. Yet even these vast piles of useless broken packaging fade into
total and abject insignificance beside the gargantuan, monstrous,
billowing masses of useless toxic plastic crap which continually spew
fourth from every infected aperture of industrial civilization,
inundating the seas, clogging the air, and encrusting the land with
inconceivable superabundancies of putrid, virulently toxic useless
disjected crap.

Whence this trend? Why these
useless extrusions and amassments of matter? Energy and matter
themselves, the constituents of our universe, embody these tendencies
in magnetism and gravitation. Galaxies hoard suns, suns planets,
planets moons. The Earth erupts, burying forests in layered lava.
Millennia of compacted sediment, swept seawards by rivers, are sorted
into strata and made rock. But it is in passing from the Mineral to the
Animal kingdom that we see how the human tendency to produce and hoard
objects is prefigured not only in inert matter, but also in the deep
genetic imperatives that we share with bugs and beasts.
Most anamalian phyla boast a few species that indulge in hoarding
behavior. Caddisfly larvae amass and cement detritus into armored
encasements in which they live and grow. Spiders enshroud, embalm and
inject their prey. Certain woodpeckers collect vast quantities of
acorns, each inserted into an individually excavated declivity in the
trunk of a deceased tree. Yet, note this curious fact: hoarding is
almost unknown among non-human primates (VanderWall 224). Alone among
our simian brethren, we humans succumb to the urge to collect and amass
objects. Surveying the whole of the animal kingdom, we find many
animals with the hoarding instinct, but three groups in particular
stand out as exceptional hoarders- rodents, communal insects, and
humans. An investigation of hoarding behavior in rodents and insects
will suggest that much of domesticated human behavior represents an
atavistic reversion to the deeply encoded habits of those animals we
most abhor.
The vast megalopolises of the ants
and termites, with their specialized castes of workers, farmers and
soldiers, perhaps represent the closest animal equivalent to human
civilization. Observe the towering constructions of the African
termites, crammed with crawling beings, separated at birth into
specialized castes, all mindlessly devoted to the single purpose of
their bloated progenitor, which is to inundate the environment with
copies of itself. Extensive tunneling and exoskeletal encasement are
all behaviors uniquely characteristic of humans and collective insects.
The metallic pods in which domesticated humans habitually transport
their distended bodies, are made of ores and oils tunneled out from
deep below the surface. Human cities, scabrous exudations of asphalt
and concrete, are seen by satellites, while those of insects appear
prominently in photographs taken from airplanes (329).
Hoarding
ants fall into three groups: collectors of seeds, nectar and corpses
(329). While many species of ants merely “collect nectar and honeydew
and transport these sweet exudates in their distensible crops to nests
(333),” a few species go far beyond this. “Their abdomens often become
so enlarged and distended that movement becomes slow and cumbersome.
Individuals called repletes imbibe so much liquid that their gasters
become greatly distended, the sclerites of the abdomen are forced apart
by the volume of liquid, exposing intersegmental membranes. The gaster
becomes spherical and so large that locomotion is extremely difficult
(333).” These chronically engorged individuals cling immobile to the
ceilings of their dark caverns, where they serve as living storerooms.
Sadly, their human equivalents, the burgeoning legions of the morbidly
obese, can seldom relish in total immobility, but are occasionally
compelled to hoist themselves up from before their glowing screens,
heave their globular bulks into transport pods, and travel to the local
cathedrals of consumerism. Here at least electrical carts have been
provided, to convey them up and down the aisles, lest a single calorie
be expended in the loathed and gratuitous exertion of walking.
Communal insects are not the only hoarding arthropods. The coprophagous
beetles or Scarabs also indulge in this pursuit, as do the burying
beetles (Nicrophorus ssp.), which are among the few species that
consistently hoard food items larger than themselves (322). In this
respect, they may be classed with Costco shoppers. But while these
latter hoard whole pallets of processed, extruded food pellets and
pharmaceuticals, the burying beetles restrict themselves to the
decaying corpses of animals discovered on their morning perambulations.
The burying beetles diligently excavate the earth beneath their carrion
fodder, until the decomposing mass begins to sink below the surface.
“As burial occurs, the corpse’s extremities are drawn in until the
bloating carcass forms a nearly spherical mass (327). The carcass then
gradually becomes an amorphous mass of putrefying tissue. After the
pair of beetles copulates, the female lays her eggs in a small
receptacle at the top of the chamber, and further processes the
carcass. Male and female regurgitate droplets of partially digested
tissue. If the carefully prepared spherule of putrefaction becomes
infested with fly eggs, the Nicrophorus pair will seek out, discover,
and transport special phoretic mites that feed on such eggs. But the
necrophilic diligence of these beetles, and their subterranean rites of
sex and decay are all to a distinct and admirable purpose, and partake
of none of the maniacal excess, the unbounded lust to amass to which
human hoarders succumb. For a bestial analog to this, we must turn to
the rodents.
Most hoarding mammals are rodents (217), probably the
most ancient, ubiquitous and successful order of that class.

These
animals, employed without pay by the millions in scientific
laboratories, are our direct ancestors, and their psychological and
anatomical characteristics provide curious analogs to our own.
Obsessive Compulsive disorder (OCD) has many frankly rodential
manifestations, especially excessive grooming and repetitive checking.
One OCD researcher notes that “two of the youngest boys in our study
spend 2-11 hours each day licking their hands, each finger gets licked
in its turn, the order doesn’t change. The atavistic patterns set loose
in these children will probably be replaced as they grow older with
more ordinary washing rituals (Rapoport 197).” The same scientist
elsewhere observes that rats spend one third of their waking lives
grooming (196). Repetitive or compulsive checking is another classic
rodential symptom of OCD. For example, patients will feel irresistibly
compelled to return home and check if they have turned off the stove or
locked the front door. This compulsive checking can greatly interfere
with the course of their lives. Among hoarding rodents, including the
short-tailed shrew Blarina brevicauda “maintenance of caches is
characterized by frequent checking and rechecking (VanderWall 220).”
This reviewing or checking of hoarded objects in rodents is analogous
to the making of written accounts of agricultural surpluses by early
domesticated humans in the Fertile Crescent. It is thought that writing
originated in these attempts to keep track of and document the
surpluses resulting from ancient agriculture. While rodents may mark
their hoards by defecating and urinating on them (220), the early
administrators used carved cylinder seals for that purpose.
The domestication of animals has its own curious analog among
rodents. Domesticated animals, for example sheep and cows, are notable
for their stupidity, dullness and cowardess, compared to their wild
progenitors, the mountain goats and the mighty forest aurochs of
prehistory. The European mole performs a sort of rudimentary
psychosurgery on the animals it captures. They “store large worms and
insects in the walls of galleries. The moles prevent the earthworms
from leaving by eating or mutilating the 2 to 7 anteriormost segments
of the head region… Under the cool temperatures that obtain in soil
during winter, injured worms remain fresh and otherwise healthy for
months (222).” The hoards of this species of mole sometimes consist of
vast accumulations of zombified microfauna. “One of the largest caches
contained 1,280 earthworms and 18 cock-chafer grubs, weighed 2.1 kilos,
in a chamber embedded in the wall of a segment of tunnel (223). But
even this estimable accumulation of lobotomized annelids is only a
faint intimation of the vast platoons of enslaved, stupefied beasts
amassed in the factory farms of first world nations, where wallowing in
their own festering excrement, they blindly gnaw the flesh of their
fellows, berserk with horror.
Other rodents too
excel in hoarding and amassing heaps of disjected trash. Red squirrel
middens, composed of debris and the encasements of harvested nuts,
sometimes attain to widths of 7-10 meters and depths of 40 cm (241).
But the supreme master of hoarding rodents is undoubtedly the hamster,
a wee beast which itself now frequently constitutes a minute subsection
of the accumulated possessions of domesticated humans, along the
corridors of whose habitations it is to be seen progressing encased in
an extruded plastic spheroid. The word hamster derives from the German
hamstern “-to hoard.” Its Arabic name means “grandfather saddlebags.”
This animal’s cheek pouches, which can double the width of its head,
must be manually disgorged (263). Hamsters have been observed to hoard
in excess of 90 kilos of food, an incredible quantity for an animal
that itself generally weighs about a tenth of a kilo. This would be
equivalent to a 150 lb. human amassing tons of possessions. Yet it is
far from unheard of for domesticated humans to hoard possessions orders
of magnitude greater than this. It would be a difficult calculation to
make, estimating the combined gross weight of the average American’s
possessions, but anyone attempting it would need to take into account
not only the multiple transport pods, washing machines, dryers,
refrigerators, televisions, computers, heating and cooling apparatus,
furniture, aquaria, and recreational vehicles, but also entire houses,
buildings and commercial enterprises, with their innumerable and
ponderous appurtenances. Not to mention the often considerable
magnitude of their own persons, swollen by undulating accumulations of
adiposity, the results of long term, chronic ingestion of synthetic
lipids and the charred flesh of enslaved beasts, abetted by a sessile
lifestyle spent enthralled to the paltry entertainments afforded by
passive, screen-based electronic entertainments.
Taken altogether, the hoarding behavior of insects and rodents seem
wise and reasonable alongside the clearly pathological amassments of
domesticated humans. In the USA, even homeless people often obtain and
transport masses of possessions several times larger than their own
personal weights. Their strength is scarcely sufficient to push their
rusted shopping carts, which overflow with burgeoning bags of clothes
and hoarded debris. These sadly bedraggled individuals provide a sort
of degraded parody of the abundances of the rich.
Human Hoarders

A lurking abomination lies hid behind the vinyl facades and trimmed
shrubberies of suburbia. Shrouded by curtains, crammed into obscure
closets, or locked into basements, the horror all too often escapes and
engulphs the residents, subsuming them in an unstoppable tide. In vain
they scurry like rats along the dark, narrow, clogged corridors of
their houses, unaware that they and their entire environment have been
subsumed in a monstrous, atavistic, reversion to rodential psychology
and aesthetics. The name of this horror? -Compulsive Hoarding!
While the amassments of modern, domesticated humans are impressive, and
put to shame even the most industrious of rodents, we view these
deposits with complacency, or envy. No supernatural awe attends the
unveiling of an acquaintance’s collection of 537 encoded plastic discs,
his 37 articulated, extruded plastic figurines, or his 47 inch personal
circumference. But when such accumulations begin to stray beyond
certain limits, a sort of unspeakable horror begins to invest them. The
line between acceptable consumerism and rampant, compulsive hoarding is
easily crossed. The compulsive hoarder’s house becomes filled with such
quantities of useless decaying detritus that only narrow corridors
remain to afford access the rooms. These corridors represent an
unconscious reversion to the tunnels of rodents and collective
insects. In more extreme cases, even these corridors fill up,
forcing investigators to literally swim through semiclogged apertures
near the ceilings, which are often dangerously bowed down from the
accumulated weight of possessions in the upper levels. Generally
accessing the sofa is futile, and the stove is rendered unusable under
luxuriant, enfungated encrustations of conglobulated waste. Where, as
is not infrequently the case, domestic animals are present, expansive,
laminated, putrescent floodplains of excrement coat those few areas of
floor left exposed.
Interestingly, the central problem for
compulsive hoarders is not so much that they acquire too many
possessions, but that they find it impossible to throw anything away.
The daily junk mail crammedthrough the front slot often proves
particularly problematic in this respect. The huge quantities of
packaging, waste, and outdated possessions that are disposed of by most
citizens thus are hidden from view and removed from contemplation. They
are thrown “away.” In a closed system such as the earth, there is of
course really no “away.” Thus the foul, vomitously stank conditions
found in the compulsive hoarder’s home provide a sort of microcosmic
mirror of the large scale effects of mass industrial civilization on
the planet.
And compulsive hoarding is
frighteningly common. Almost without fail, every person with whom I
bring up the subject knows of at least one case. The full spectrum is
represented. I can remember one childhood babysitter whose house,
although otherwise tidy, contained a single room entirely filled with
hoarded crap. Upon opening the door, one saw a solid, contiguous wall
of useless junk. Perhaps, in accordance with the alchemical motto “As
above, so below,” incidences of individual compulsive hoarding increase
and grow more horrific in parallel with the burgeoning slew of waste
extruded by large scale mass industrial civilization.
Is there not
a peculiar species of intermixed horror and awe that arises from the
contemplation of a house entirely crammed with hoarded debris? A sort
of frisson perhaps is felt. The sight implies the long-term, chronic
abandonment of socially constructed boundaries of control, the
unfettered burgeoning of tendencies normally suppressed, the permanent
and irreversible irruption of latent lusts. For me at least, a certain
powerful and undeniable fascination manifests wherever such a dynamic
protrudes into view.
The disguised pathology
inherent in industrial civilization is freely and openly shown in the
behavior of compulsive hoarders. Attempts by neighborhood committees,
police, and interfering busybodies to suppress the phenomenon may
abate, but they cannot permanently halt, these explosive effulgences of
superfluous crap. The nauseating, mountainous, botulized heaps of
useless disjected trash which fill the homes of hoarders are the
inevitable microcosmic reflections of the insufferable, gargantuan
deposits of useless waste resulting from our civilization, the
apotheosis of unbounded growth. In planetary terms this manifests
as industrial civilization, in domestic terms as compulsive hoarding,
and in personal terms as cancer.
The
conglobulated agluteriminations and accreted encrustations of useless
toxic extruded industrial secretions now

generally much fetishized,
frequently are acquired and disjected with such ceaseless and
implacable vehemence that unsightly inundations threaten the houses, or
menace the apartments of hapless consumers. While some, the hoarders,
are content to permit, or even eager to luxuriate in, the inevitable
enfungated slew of items, others are disconcerted by the incipient
squalor. For these, the widely advertised STORAGE UNIT is available for
the effective sequestration of those objects whose uselessness forbids
retention, but whose socially constructed value prevents the disposal
they so obviously merit. What a different prospect the streets of
American cities might present if such facilities were available for the
burgeoning effulgencies of adiposity now enswathing most bodies. Then,
the rhythmic, convulsive gyrations of consumers, as they strive to
heave themselves out of their transport pods, into the megastores,
where even more superfluous crap is to be purchased, would no longer be
visible. Like the intricate nuptials of mastodons, or the abysmal
combats of trilobites, such displays would then be classed among the
dimly envisioned spectacles of the past.
But
such is not the case. Hulking near the edges of town, or lurking in the
decayed cores of cities, the storage facilities are to be seen,
surrounded with razor wire, pretentious festoons that belie the
worthlessness of their guarded contents. True seekers rob elsewhere. A
certain vacuous numinosity invests these structures, whose long rows of
garage doors, cinderblock walls, and asphaltic surfaces are kept blank
of weeds by powerful herbicides. Here is a building devoid of living
purpose, a constructed extrusion principally serviceable to unused
things, a monument to the subjugation of life to its adjunct
appurtenances.
Indeed it is not unheard of for people to get
trapped in their storage units. A slipping door or jammed lock have
been known to entomb a consumer among a selection of their most
undesired possessions. Sometimes rescue intervenes, sometimes death.
Who knows now how many desiccated mummies await discovery at the
auction of their goods, like the Egyptian pharaohs, whose graves were
early looted, their expertly crafted golden sarcophagi and amulets
crudely melted quick into raw bullion for trade, and their carefully
embalmed flesh heedlessly ground into spurious medicines? With what
express rapidity are all attempts at physical greatness immediately
subsumed into the seething oblivion of constant transformation that
characterizes our existence! If anything briefly persists, say the
shattered toe of some statue, or the scrap end of a few hexameters
below some dull monk’s palimpsest, it serves more as a testament to the
absolute futility of human ambition, than to the vain hope of value
achieved by renown. The ravaged graves, the monuments, effaced either
by time, Muslims, or malevolence, the vague humps and furrows that
persist behind vanished cities all indicate the supreme importance of
this living moment, in which our full potentials of awareness by
immediately be exercised, above the uncertain possibility of fame,
which is the supposition of a potential mental state set up in some
hypothetical individual in an unknown place and time.
Grim listings faintly appear in obscure subsections of newspapers,
quietly announcing the dispersal of the amassed goods of the fresh
dead. Prior to the ESTATE SALE, the surviving kin, themselves
accelerating towards death, view the musty chattels of the departed,
and either squabble viciously over these disjected husks, or paw
through them with mixed melancholy, indifference and despair. Visit
such sales, reader, on your empty Sunday afternoons, for instruction in
the sciences of vanity and the manifest futility of grasping. Wizened
crones clog the corridors, scrutinizing flatware. Orthodox Goths like
me need no exhortations to attend such events, where we are to be seen
with our nubile assistants, seeking old photographs and diaries.
Bargaining is possible. Often an unplacable stench prevails, perhaps
that of death. At the end of the sale, some few objects may have been
sold, and the rest are condemned to the Goodwill, or more likely, to
the landfill. The whole event shows that the crap amassed during a
lifetime is more noteworthy for the trouble caused by its disposal,
than for any supposed value to those still living. Similarly, it is
difficult to imagine that the deep layer of stratified toxic plastic
slurry that will be the remains of our civilization will be of any real
interest to future archeologists, such will be its extent and ubiquity.
Rather the real challenge will be to mine it as a resource, to clear it
away for the safe cultivation of crops, or, most likely, to search out
those few areas where it is not to be found.

Bibliography
Rapoport, Judith. The Boy Who Couldn’t Stop Washing. C.P. Dutton, New York, 1989.
VanderWall, Stephen B.. Food Hoarding in Animals. University of Chicago, 1990.
Copyright 2005 by David Drexler
Home |
Art |
Writing |
Travel |
Shop